🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.